Board introductions have a feature list which isn't formatted properly
according to rST and is thus rendered incorrectly.
Fix this by adding the missing newlines in the appropriate places.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Add a blank line after title "Specification:" to
make it render correctly html.
And also remove the useless > in bash code block.
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andyshrk@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Most Rockchip device tree related bindings are converted to YAML
and available in the U-boot /dts/upstream/Bindings/ directory.
Remove all redundant U-boot entries.
Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Although it has historically been different, the current standard
spelling of the neutral singular possessive pronoun is "its".
Signed-off-by: J. Neuschäfer <j.ne@posteo.net>
The boot_fdt_add_mem_rsv_regions() function can be called twice, e.g.
first time during the board init (as a part of LMB init), and then when
booting the OS with 'booti' command:
lmb_add_region_flags
lmb_reserve_flags
boot_fdt_reserve_region
boot_fdt_add_mem_rsv_regions
^
|
+-----------------------+
| (1) | (2)
lmb_reserve_common image_setup_linux
lmb_init ...
initr_lmb do_booti
board_init_r 'booti'
That consequently leads to the attempt of reserving the same memory
areas (described in the 'reserved-memory' dts node) in LMB. The
lmb_add_region_flags() returns -EEXIST error code in such cases, but
boot_fdt_reserve_region() handles all negative error codes as a failure
to reserve fdt memory region, printing corresponding error messages,
which are essentially harmless, but misleading. For example, this is the
output of 'booti' command on E850-96 board:
=> booti $loadaddr - $fdtaddr
...
ERROR: reserving fdt memory region failed
(addr=bab00000 size=5500000 flags=2)
ERROR: reserving fdt memory region failed
(addr=f0000000 size=200000 flags=4)
...
Starting kernel ...
The mentioned false positive error messages are observed starting with
commit 1d9aa4a283 ("lmb: Fix the allocation of overlapping memory
areas with !LMB_NONE"), which removes the check for the already added
memory regions in lmb_add_region_flags(), making it return -1 for
!LMB_NONE cases. Another commit 827dee587b ("fdt: lmb: add reserved
regions as no-overwrite") changes flags used for reserving memory in
boot_fdt_add_mem_rsv_regions() from LMB_NONE to LMB_NOOVERWRITE. So
together with the patch mentioned earlier, it makes
lmb_add_region_flags() return -1 when called from
boot_fdt_reserve_region().
Since then, the different patch was implemented, returning -EEXIST error
code in described cases, which is:
lmb: Return -EEXIST in lmb_add_region_flags() if region already added
Handle -EEXIST error code as a normal (successful) case in
lmb_reserve_flags() and don't print any messages.
Fixes: 1d9aa4a283 ("lmb: Fix the allocation of overlapping memory areas with !LMB_NONE")
Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
An attempt to add the already added LMB region using
lmb_add_region_flags() ends up in lmb_addrs_overlap() check, which
eventually leads to either returning 0 if 'flags' is LMB_NONE, or -1
otherwise. It makes it impossible for the user of this function to catch
the case when the region is already added and differentiate it from
regular errors. That in turn may lead to incorrect error handling in the
caller code, like reporting misleading errors or interrupting the normal
code path where it could be treated as the normal case. An example is
boot_fdt_reserve_region() function, which might be called twice (e.g.
during board startup in initr_lmb(), and then during 'booti' command
booting the OS), thus trying to reserve exactly the same memory regions
described in the device tree twice, which produces an error message on
second call.
Return -EEXIST error code in case when the added region exists and it's
not LMB_NONE; for LMB_NONE return 0, to conform to unit tests
(specifically test_alloc_addr() in test/lib/lmb.c) and the preferred
behavior described in commit 1d9aa4a283 ("lmb: Fix the allocation of
overlapping memory areas with !LMB_NONE"). The change of
lmb_add_region_flags() return values is described in the table below:
Return case Pre-1d9 1d9 New
-----------------------------------------------------------
Added successfully 0 0 0
Failed to add -1 -1 -1
Already added, flags == LMB_NONE 0 0 0
Already added, flags != LMB_NONE 0 -1 -EEXIST
Rework all affected functions and their documentation. Also fix the
corresponding unit test which checks reserving the same region with the
same flags to account for the changed return value.
No functional change is intended (by this patch itself).
Fixes: 1d9aa4a283 ("lmb: Fix the allocation of overlapping memory areas with !LMB_NONE")
Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Since RPI works well using EFI and has no size limitations with regards
to U-Boot, add the needed structures to support capsule updates.
While at it update the most commonly used defconfigs and include capsule
support and U-Boot commands needed by EFI
Tested-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
For a lot of usecases, such as display, camera, media
the Raspberry Pi needs a lot more CMA than distros
configure as default so we should pass this parameter
through so things work as expected. Fix a spelling
mistake while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Comment changes only, no functional change.
Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Kconfig strings and comment changes only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The correct spelling is R-Car, including the dash, update the usage.
Comment change only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The U-Boot is currently not capable of handling ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45
PHYs correctly, and also does not handle MDIO bus wide reset-gpios property.
Until proper C45 PHY support lands in U-Boot, disable AVB1/AVB2 interfaces.
This only disables the two MACs with 88Q2110/88Q2112 100/1000BASE-T1 PHYs
on ethenet sub-board, the main board AVB0 ethernet is unaffected.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
In rzg2l_pinconf_set(), there are no new variables defined in the case
statement for PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE so no additional scope is needed.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
On the RZ/G2L SoC family, the direction of the Ethernet TXC/TX_CLK
signal is selectable to support an Ethernet PHY operating in either MII
or RGMII mode. By default, the signal is configured as an input and MII
mode is supported. The ETH_MODE register can be modified to configure
this signal as an output to support RGMII mode.
As this signal is be default an input, and can optionally be switched to
an output, it maps neatly onto an `output-enable` property in the device
tree.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
The Ethenet interfaces on the Renesas RZ/G2L SoC family can operate at
multiple power supply voltages: 3.3V (default value), 2.5V and 1.8V.
rzg2l_pinconf_set() is extended to support the 2.5V setting, with a
check to ensure this is only used on Ethernet interfaces as it is not
supported on the SD & QSPI interfaces.
While we're modifying rzg2l_pinconf_set(), drop the unnecessary default
value for pwr_reg as it is set in every branch of the following if
condition.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
In the RZ/G2L family, core clocks are always on and can't be disabled.
However, drivers which are shared with other SoCs may call clk_enable()
or clk_enable_bulk() for a clock referenced in the device tree which
happens to be a core clock on the RZ/G2L. To avoid the need for
conditionals in these drivers, simply ignore attempts to enable a core
clock.
Signed-off-by: Paul Barker <paul.barker.ct@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
When MbedTLS TLS features were added MBEDTLS_HAVE_TIME was defined as part
of enabling https:// support. However that pointed to the wrong function
which could crash if it received a NULL pointer.
Looking closer that function is not really needed, as it only seems to
increase the RNG entropy by using 4b of the current time and date.
The reason that was enabled is that lwIP was unconditionally requiring it,
although it's configurable and can be turned off.
Since lwIP doesn't use that field anywhere else, make it conditional and
disable it from our config.
Fixes: commit a564f5094f ("mbedtls: Enable TLS 1.2 support")
Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Add a missing comma in the update_info structure declaration.
This fixes the following build error when building with
EFI_RUNTIME_UPDATE_CAPSULE or EFI_CAPSULE_ON_DISK:
board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c:52:9: error: request for member ‘images’ in something not a structure or union
Fixes: cccea18813 ("efi_loader: add the number of image entries in efi_capsule_update_info")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Cc: Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@linaro.org>
Cc: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@iki.fi>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Building qemu_arm64_defconfig with CONFIGS_DM_RTC=n and CONFIGS_RTC_PL031=y
leads to a build failure.
Adjust the vexpress64 configuration to avoid circular dependency.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
There are platforms which set the value of ram_top based on certain
restrictions that the platform might have in accessing memory above
ram_top, even when the memory region is in the same DRAM bank. So,
even though the LMB allocator works as expected, when trying to
allocate memory above ram_top, prohibit this by marking all memory
above ram_top as reserved, even if the said memory region is from the
same bank.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-tpm/-/pipelines/23719
Two fixes for the EFI subsystem coming via the TPM tree as agreed by Heinrich
The LMB patch fixes a failure in SystemReady testing. Nothing bad happens
without the patch in the device operation, but the return values are wrong
and SCT tests fail for MemoryAllocationServicesTest category.
The second is a shielding the device against mistakes in the definition of
struct fields needed by the capsule update mechanism. Instead of crashing,
print a humna readable message of what's wrong.
At the moment the LMB allocator will return 'success' immediately on two
consecutive allocations if the second one is smaller and the flags match
without resizing the reserved area.
This is problematic for two reasons, first of all the new updated
allocation won't update the size and we end up holding more memory than
needed, but most importantly it breaks the EFI SCT tests since EFI
now allocates via LMB.
More specifically when EFI requests a specific address twice with the
EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS flag set, the first allocation will succeed and
update the EFI memory map. Due to the LMB behavior the second allocation
will also succeed but the address ranges are already in the EFI memory
map due the first allocation. EFI will then fail to update the memory map,
returning EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES instead of EFI_NOT_FOUND which break EFI
conformance.
So let's remove the fast check with is problematic anyway and leave LMB
resize and calculate address properly. LMB will now
- try to resize the reservations for LMB_NONE
- return -1 if the memory is not LMB_NONE and already reserved
The LMB code needs some cleanup in that part, but since we are close to
2025.01 do the easy fix and plan to refactor it later.
Also update the dm tests with the new behavior.
Fixes: commit 22f2c9ed9f ("efi: memory: use the lmb API's for allocating and freeing memory")
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Tom Rini
Leonard AnderweitandHeinrich Schuchardt
Jerome ForissierandHeinrich Schuchardt
Quentin SchulzandHeinrich Schuchardt
Simon GlassandHeinrich Schuchardt
Andy YanandHeinrich Schuchardt
Johan JonkerandHeinrich Schuchardt
J. NeuschäferandHeinrich Schuchardt
Sam ProtsenkoandTom Rini
Roger QuadrosandTom Rini
Ilias ApalodimasandPeter Robinson
Michal Simek
Marek Vasut
Venkatesh Yadav AbbarapuandMarek Vasut
Paul BarkerandMarek Vasut
Vincent StehléandTom Rini
Sughosh GanuandTom Rini